Volume 36: Number 127
Sun, 11 Nov 2018
Subjects Discussed In This Issue:
Message: 1
From: Simon Montagu
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 20:07:42 +0200
Subject: Re: [Avodah] Reading Newspapers and Other secular Literature
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:36 PM Toby Katz via Avodah <
avo...@lists.aishdas.org> wrote:
>
> Since these journals were published more than a century ago, no one alive
> today has seen these papers except for a few academic researchers with
> access to old library archives.
>
>
> All of us here are busy talking about things we have never seen, like the
> far side of the moon.
>
This is not quite true: together with lots of other Hebrew journals, they
are all available online at
http://web.nli.org.il/sites/JPress/English/Pages/default.aspx
I doubt if that site gets as many hits as the New York Times, so basically
you are right, but at least anyone who cares can judge for themselves what
these newspapers were like
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/avodah-aishdas.org/attachments/20181106/432cb300/attachment-0001.html>
Go to top.
Message: 2
From: Ben Waxman
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 20:59:09 +0200
Subject: Re: [Avodah] Reading Newspapers and Other secular Literature
If no one has seen them, how do you know what was in them? You did a
research paper?
Ben
On 11/6/2018 5:18 AM, Toby Katz via Avodah wrote:
> Since these journals were published more than a century ago, no one
> alive today has seen these papers except for a few academic
> researchers with access to old library archives.? They were weeklies
> and even though they did carry some news, they were more like today's
> intellectual journals of opinion, with long articles discussing the
> issues of the day from a philosophical, hashkafic point of view
Go to top.
Message: 3
From: Micha Berger
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 15:04:28 -0500
Subject: Re: [Avodah] Reading Newspapers and Other secular Literature
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 10:18:40PM -0500, Toby Katz via Avodah wrote:
: From: Micha Berger <mi...@aishdas.org>
:> HaMagid was an shomer Shabbos *Haskalishe* newspaper....
:> Not JO. (Which also isn't reading the news on Shabbos, regardless of
:> whose paper.)
: You are using <<haskalasha>> in a somewhat misleading way. When we
: speak of the Haskalah or of maskilim we are generally speaking of a
: secular intellectual and academic movement and of people who were not
: religious and who were often virulently anti-religious. Wissenschaft des
: Judentums type...
This is revisionist. When Beruriah David's PhD paper talks about the
Maharatz Chajes as a Masekil, she was indeed talking about Wissenschaft
types, but certainly not unobservant, never mind "virulantly
anti-religious".
In any case, the modern parallel to what we're talkiong about is if one
of today's "yeshivish" rashei yeshivah, who happens to also be a Zionist,
read a newspaper -- not a Torah magazine like JO -- put out by a LWMO
"Academic Orthodox" type institution.
: You are also using <<Zionist>> in a somewhat misleading way.? These were
: pre-Herzl days, when something was in the air, some stirring to return to
: Eretz Yisrael, but not the secular or even Mizrachi Zionism we know today.
I think you misunderstand the history. This is Chovevei Tzion, the people
who brought you Achad haAm. These were Orthodox Jews who aligned with
Secular Zionism. The people who founded Petach Tiqva in 1882.
Bilu was also well on its way by the Netzi's hayday. But that has little
to do with haMad.
: The journals the Netziv read were a little on the modern side,
: moderate-charedi, showing an interest in worldly matters, but they were
: definitely Orthodox.
Nope. This is also revisionist. At least "moderate chareidi" is.
: Since these journals were published more than a century ago, no one
: alive today has seen these papers except for a few academic researchers
: with access to old library archives....
Or Google.
http://www.jpress.nli.org.il/Olive/APA/NLI/?action=tab&tab=browse&pub=MGD&_ga=2.44647777.412515131.1541534577-590544565.1541534577#panel=browse
Tir'u baTov!
-Micha
--
Micha Berger You are where your thoughts are.
mi...@aishdas.org - Ramban, Igeres haQodesh, Ch. 5
http://www.aishdas.org
Fax: (270) 514-1507
Go to top.
Message: 4
From: M Cohen
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 10:15:12 -0500
Subject: [Avodah] Length, the Aruch haShulchan's shitah
> Meaning a AhS tefach is 3.5". ( 1 tefach * 6 tefachim / ammah = 21" = 1
> ammah)
> Compare to RMF (IM OC 1:136) who says that a tefach is 4.54" (9cm) and an
> ammah is 21-1/4" (53.98cm).
You meant to say:
RMF (IM OC 1:136) tefach is 3.54" (9cm) and ammah 21-1/4" (53.98cm).
[Yes, I typoed -- 3 and 4 are adjacent keys. Which is how the error didn't
reach my times-6 result for the ammah. -micha]
Go to top.
Message: 5
From: Zev Sero
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 10:16:46 -0500
Subject: Re: [Avodah] Kol Koreh that there is a chiyuv to vaccinate
On 6/11/18 8:10 am, Moshe Y. Gluck via Avodah wrote:
> It's interesting that R' Moshe Sternbuch's note only speaks about the
> obligation of the father to vaccinate. Chinuch is on the father, if I'm
> not mistaken. But shouldn't vaccination be sort of like m'nias hezek
> and obligatory on both parents?
My guess is that these decisions are usually left to the mother, and the
anti-vaxx nonsense has spread mostly among women, so he's now telling
the men that it's their duty to insist on vaccinating the children even
if their wives are opposed.
--
Zev Sero A prosperous and healthy 5779 to all
z...@sero.name Seek Jerusalem's peace; may all who love you prosper
Go to top.
Message: 6
From: Rich, Joel
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 19:25:01 +0000
Subject: [Avodah] daven/learn
I'm told the "minhag haolam" is to get up early to learn and then daven
(even if that is not the first minyan available). Assuming the learning
starts after the earliest time for davening, shouldn't the "minhag" be to
daven first, then learn?
KT
Joel Rich
THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE
ADDRESSEE. IT MAY CONTAIN PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION THAT IS EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE. Dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message by anyone other than the addressee is
strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify us
immediately by replying: "Received in error" and delete the message.
Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aishdas.org/pipermail/avodah-aishdas.org/attachments/20181107/50bcb2cb/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Avodah mailing list
Avo...@lists.aishdas.org
http://www.aishdas.org/lists/avodah
http://lists.aishdas.org/listinfo.cgi/avodah-aishdas.org
------------------------------
***************************************
Send Avodah mailing list submissions to
avodah@lists.aishdas.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.aishdas.org/lists/avodah/avodahareivim-membership-agreement/
You can reach the person managing the list at
avodah-owner@lists.aishdas.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Avodah digest..."
A list of common acronyms is available at
http://www.aishdas.org/lists/avodah/avodah-acronyms
(They are also visible in the web archive copy of each digest.)