Halakhah and Phenomenology – The Actually Perceived

You may also like...

No Responses

  1. August 17, 2010 – ז׳ באלול תש״ע

    […] qavu’ah. (A question that stuck with me so much, I eventually developed the ideas in this post. A different resolution.) Or how the question of the age of the universe is meaningless, since the […]

  2. November 15, 2010 – ח׳ בכסלו תשע״א

    […] I will just point out the conclusions so far with respect to birur from just the last two posts (parts 2 and 3). Then we’ll discuss the concept of “chazaqah” and conclude with an […]

  3. December 29, 2010 – כ״ב בטבת תשע״א

    […] There is a rule in testimony that “terei kemei’ah” — a set of two witnesses have the same credibility in court as a set of 100. And if two testify for one party while 100 testify for the other, the two sides are equal. When it comes to cases that were under testimony, majority does not apply. (For a suggested logic behind that rule, see this entry.) […]

  4. February 22, 2011 – י״ח באדר א׳ תשע״א

    […] in this series we distinguished between cases that are qavu’ah and those where we say kol deparish, that is, those doubts that are between established items, and […]

  5. April 21, 2013 – י״א באייר תשע״ג

    […] since I’m revisiting the topic, I’m categorizing it here anyway. To save you looking up a prior post and me figuring out another way to explain RAE’s […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *